Digital Goal-Setting and Student Motivation:
A Literature Review on Technology-Driven Engagement in Middle School Education
​
​​
Theme 1: Digital Goal-Setting in Education
Overview:
Digital goal-setting refers to the use of technology platforms to help students set, monitor, and reflect on academic and personal goals. This practice is grounded in self-regulated learning theory and goal-setting theory (Schunk, 2003; Locke & Latham, 1990).
Sub-topic 1.1: Goal Orientation and Academic Outcomes
-
Mastery vs. performance goals (Dweck & Leggett, 1988)
-
Influence on intrinsic motivation and self-concept (Murayama & Elliot, 2009)
Sub-topic 1.2: Goal-Setting Tools and Platforms
-
Use of digital badges (Zyskowski, 2024)
-
Personalized learning plans and apps (Moeller et al., 2012)
Sub-topic 1.3: Goal-Setting Across Diverse Learners
-
Impact on students with learning disabilities (Schunk, 1985)
-
Benefits for struggling and advanced learners (Bandura & Schunk, 1981; Ames & Archer, 1988)
Theme 2: Student Motivation and Engagement
Overview:
Motivation is the internal drive that influences students’ willingness to engage in learning. Engagement is the behavioral manifestation of motivation.
Sub-topic 2.1: Psychological Foundations of Motivation
-
Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning (Zimmerman et al., 1992)
-
Expectancy-value theory (Eccles & Wigfield, 2020)
Sub-topic 2.2: Social Influences on Motivation
-
Teacher-student relationships (Scales et al., 2019)
-
Peer and parental support (Mauro, 2020)
Sub-topic 2.3: Gamification and Motivation
-
Gamified learning environments (Setyoadi & Patmanthara, 2024)
-
Risks and benefits of gamification (Jaramillo-Mediavilla et al., 2024)
Theme 3: Technology Integration and Academic Performance
Overview:
Technology integration involves embedding digital tools into instruction to enhance learning outcomes.
Sub-topic 3.1: Models of Technology Integration
-
TPACK, SAMR, and EST models (Parsadanov, 2017)
Sub-topic 3.2: Impact on Student Achievement
-
1:1 technology initiatives (Harris et al., 2016)
-
Online learning behavior as a mediator (Meng & Hu, 2022)
Sub-topic 3.3: Equity and Access Issues
-
Disparities in access and digital literacy (Monserate, 2023)
-
COVID-19 and remote learning challenges (Gerardot, 2024)
Summary
This body of literature contributes significantly to the broader field of education by:
-
Highlighting the role of goal-setting in fostering self-regulated learning and intrinsic motivation.
-
Demonstrating how technology can enhance or hinder student engagement depending on its implementation.
-
Offering insights into personalized learning, gamification, and digital equity.
Strengths:
-
Diverse methodologies (experimental, correlational, mixed methods)
-
Broad applicability across subjects and student populations
Weaknesses:
-
Limited longitudinal studies
-
Inconsistent definitions and measures of engagement
Gaps:
-
Lack of research on middle school students using digital goal-setting apps
-
Need for studies that combine goal-setting, motivation, and technology in a unified framework
​
​
References
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267.
​
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-
motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598.
​
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2),
256–273.
​
Gerardot, A. L. (2024). How technology impacts student achievement in the classroom (Master’s thesis, Purdue University).
​
Harris, J. L., Al-Bataineh, M. T., & Al-Bataineh, A. (2016). One-to-one technology and its effect on student academic
achievement and motivation. Education, 137(1), 19–26.
​
Jaramillo-Mediavilla, L., Basantes-Andrade, A., Cabezas-González, M., & Casillas-Martín, S. (2024). Impact of gamification on
motivation and academic performance: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 639.​
​Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice Hall.
​​
Meng, X., & Hu, Z. (2022). The relationship between student motivation and academic performance: The mediating role of
online learning behavior. Quality Assurance in Education, 31(1), 167–180.
​
Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal and classroom goal structures on interest and academic
engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 432–447.
​
Moeller, A. J., Theiler, J. M., & Wu, C. (2012). Goal setting and student achievement: A longitudinal study. The Modern
Language Journal, 96(2), 153–169.
​
​Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the Schools, 22(2), 208–223.
Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading &
Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172.
​​​
U.S. Department of Education. (2018). Student goal setting: An evidence-based practice. Midwest Comprehensive Center.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED589978.pdf
​
Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy
beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676.
​
Zyskowski, C. (2024). Effects of digital badging on middle school students’ writing motivation (Master’s thesis, SUNY Oneonta).