top of page

Digital Goal-Setting and Student Motivation:

A Literature Review on Technology-Driven Engagement in Middle School Education

​

​​

Theme 1: Digital Goal-Setting in Education

Overview:
Digital goal-setting refers to the use of technology platforms to help students set, monitor, and reflect on academic and personal goals. This practice is grounded in self-regulated learning theory and goal-setting theory (Schunk, 2003; Locke & Latham, 1990).

Sub-topic 1.1: Goal Orientation and Academic Outcomes

  • Mastery vs. performance goals (Dweck & Leggett, 1988)

  • Influence on intrinsic motivation and self-concept (Murayama & Elliot, 2009)

Sub-topic 1.2: Goal-Setting Tools and Platforms

  • Use of digital badges (Zyskowski, 2024)

  • Personalized learning plans and apps (Moeller et al., 2012)

Sub-topic 1.3: Goal-Setting Across Diverse Learners

  • Impact on students with learning disabilities (Schunk, 1985)

  • Benefits for struggling and advanced learners (Bandura & Schunk, 1981; Ames & Archer, 1988)

 

Theme 2: Student Motivation and Engagement

Overview:
Motivation is the internal drive that influences students’ willingness to engage in learning. Engagement is the behavioral manifestation of motivation.

Sub-topic 2.1: Psychological Foundations of Motivation

  • Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning (Zimmerman et al., 1992)

  • Expectancy-value theory (Eccles & Wigfield, 2020)

Sub-topic 2.2: Social Influences on Motivation

  • Teacher-student relationships (Scales et al., 2019)

  • Peer and parental support (Mauro, 2020)

Sub-topic 2.3: Gamification and Motivation

  • Gamified learning environments (Setyoadi & Patmanthara, 2024)

  • Risks and benefits of gamification (Jaramillo-Mediavilla et al., 2024)

 

Theme 3: Technology Integration and Academic Performance

Overview:
Technology integration involves embedding digital tools into instruction to enhance learning outcomes.

Sub-topic 3.1: Models of Technology Integration

  • TPACK, SAMR, and EST models (Parsadanov, 2017)

Sub-topic 3.2: Impact on Student Achievement

  • 1:1 technology initiatives (Harris et al., 2016)

  • Online learning behavior as a mediator (Meng & Hu, 2022)

Sub-topic 3.3: Equity and Access Issues

  • Disparities in access and digital literacy (Monserate, 2023)

  • COVID-19 and remote learning challenges (Gerardot, 2024)

 

Summary

This body of literature contributes significantly to the broader field of education by:

  • Highlighting the role of goal-setting in fostering self-regulated learning and intrinsic motivation.

  • Demonstrating how technology can enhance or hinder student engagement depending on its implementation.

  • Offering insights into personalized learning, gamification, and digital equity.

Strengths:

  • Diverse methodologies (experimental, correlational, mixed methods)

  • Broad applicability across subjects and student populations

Weaknesses:

  • Limited longitudinal studies

  • Inconsistent definitions and measures of engagement

Gaps:

  • Lack of research on middle school students using digital goal-setting apps

  • Need for studies that combine goal-setting, motivation, and technology in a unified framework

​

​

References

Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes.

 

    Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267.

​

Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-

 

     motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598.

​

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2),

 

     256–273.

​

Gerardot, A. L. (2024). How technology impacts student achievement in the classroom (Master’s thesis, Purdue University).

​

Harris, J. L., Al-Bataineh, M. T., & Al-Bataineh, A. (2016). One-to-one technology and its effect on student academic

 

     achievement and motivation. Education, 137(1), 19–26.

​

Jaramillo-Mediavilla, L., Basantes-Andrade, A., Cabezas-González, M., & Casillas-Martín, S. (2024). Impact of gamification on

 

     motivation and academic performance: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 639.​

 

​Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice Hall.

​​

Meng, X., & Hu, Z. (2022). The relationship between student motivation and academic performance: The mediating role of

 

     online learning behavior. Quality Assurance in Education, 31(1), 167–180.

​

Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal and classroom goal structures on interest and academic

 

     engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 432–447.

​

Moeller, A. J., Theiler, J. M., & Wu, C. (2012). Goal setting and student achievement: A longitudinal study. The Modern

 

     Language Journal, 96(2), 153–169.

​

​Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the Schools, 22(2), 208–223.

 

Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading &

 

     Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172.

​​​

U.S. Department of Education. (2018). Student goal setting: An evidence-based practice. Midwest Comprehensive Center.

 

     https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED589978.pdf

​

Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy

 

     beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676.

​

Zyskowski, C. (2024). Effects of digital badging on middle school students’ writing motivation (Master’s thesis, SUNY Oneonta).

bottom of page